<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Verizon Wireless 3-cents backlash - Questions remain</title>
	<atom:link href="http://insidemobilemarketing.com/archives/64/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://insidemobilemarketing.com/archives/64</link>
	<description>Commentary on tactics, trends and technology in Mobile Marketing</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 04:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Insider</title>
		<link>http://insidemobilemarketing.com/archives/64#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>The Insider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 14:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://insidemobilemarketing.com/?p=64#comment-60</guid>
		<description>Ha-hah! My first attempt at a prediction has been successful.
Various news accounts of VZW backtracking on their 3-cents statement. 

http://www.moconews.net/entry/419-verizon-backtracks-on-3-cent-sms-fee-its-a-proposal-up-for-discussion/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha-hah! My first attempt at a prediction has been successful.<br />
Various news accounts of VZW backtracking on their 3-cents statement. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.moconews.net/entry/419-verizon-backtracks-on-3-cent-sms-fee-its-a-proposal-up-for-discussion/"  rel="nofollow">http://www.moconews.net/entry/419-verizon-backtracks-on-3-cent-sms-fee-its-a-proposal-up-for-discussion/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
